head to head · open source

nanobrowser vs llm-scraper

nanobrowser has 13,810 GitHub stars, 1,459 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. llm-scraper has 6,936 stars, 454 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. nanobrowser leads on adoption by 99% (13,810 vs 6,936 stars). nanobrowser is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; llm-scraper is written in TypeScript under MIT. nanobrowser has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, llm-scraper 7%. llm-scraper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, browser, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nanobrowser ★ 14K llm-scraper ★ 6.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nanobrowser llm-scraper
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 6.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 454
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nanobrowser if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nanobrowser profile →

pick llm-scraper if

  • You want the llm-scraper feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and llm-scraper fits your workflow better

full llm-scraper profile →

About nanobrowser

Nanobrowser is an open source Chrome extension for AI powered web automation that runs multi agent workflows inside your own browser using your own LLM API key, built for people who want Operator style browser agents without a subscription.

read the full nanobrowser overview →

About llm-scraper

LLM Scraper is an MIT licensed TypeScript library that turns any webpage into structured data by combining Playwright with a large language model, built for developers who want typed, schema shaped extraction instead of hand written selectors.

read the full llm-scraper overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

nanobrowser vs uBlock nanobrowser vs Ladybird nanobrowser vs chrome-devtools-mcp nanobrowser vs monaco-editor nanobrowser vs Zen Browser nanobrowser vs servo nanobrowser vs serenity nanobrowser vs refined-github nanobrowser vs slate nanobrowser vs Avalonia nanobrowser vs webtorrent nanobrowser vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is nanobrowser or llm-scraper more popular?

nanobrowser has 13,810 GitHub stars and llm-scraper has 6,936. nanobrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are nanobrowser and llm-scraper free?

Both are open source. nanobrowser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and llm-scraper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nanobrowser and llm-scraper?

nanobrowser is written in TypeScript and llm-scraper in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nanobrowser or llm-scraper?

Choose nanobrowser if you want the larger community (13,810 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose llm-scraper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.