head to head · open source
Browser Use vs moli
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. moli has 22,228 stars, 611 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 439% (119,857 vs 22,228 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; moli is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, moli 3%. moli was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 6 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, cloud-browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | moli | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 22K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 611 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick moli if
- You want the moli feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and moli fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About moli
Moli English 简体中文 日本語 Deutsch Français Español Moli is a production ready headless browser for AI agents. Its on demand layout and rendering design combines a complete browser runtime with a lightweight resource footprint. Moli helps your AI agent fetch and extract web pages, search the web, and automate browser tasks. Use it through the CLI, CDP, WebDriver Classic, or WebDriver BiDi. Moli supports Linux, macOS, and Windows. Quick start Give this prompt to your AI agent: Direct installation On Linux or macOS: On Windows, run in PowerShell: Showcase An HTML5 game rendered by Moli and inspected live through Chrome…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or moli more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and moli has 22,228. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and moli free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and moli under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and moli?
Browser Use is written in Python and moli in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or moli?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose moli if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.