head to head · open source

mocha vs buster

mocha has 22,894 GitHub stars, 3,151 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. buster has 9,302 stars, 694 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. mocha leads on adoption by 146% (22,894 vs 9,302 stars). mocha is written in JavaScript under MIT; buster is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. mocha has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, buster 7%. mocha was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mocha ★ 23K buster ★ 9.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mocha buster
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 9.3K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-27
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 694
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mocha if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mocha profile →

pick buster if

  • You want the buster feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and buster fits your workflow better

full buster profile →

About mocha

Mocha is a classic, reliable and trusted test framework for Node.js and the browser, distributed as an open source JavaScript module under the MIT licence and aimed at JavaScript developers and package maintainers who need to write and run automated tests inside a Node.js process or in a browser environment.

read the full mocha overview →

About buster

Buster is a free, open source browser extension for Chrome, Edge and Firefox that helps people solve difficult CAPTCHA challenges by completing reCAPTCHA audio challenges with speech recognition, and it is intended for ordinary human users rather than automation operators.

read the full buster overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

mocha vs uBlock mocha vs Ladybird mocha vs chrome-devtools-mcp mocha vs monaco-editor mocha vs Zen Browser mocha vs servo mocha vs serenity mocha vs refined-github mocha vs slate mocha vs Avalonia mocha vs webtorrent mocha vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is mocha or buster more popular?

mocha has 22,894 GitHub stars and buster has 9,302. mocha has the larger community by that measure.

Are mocha and buster free?

Both are open source. mocha is licensed under MIT and buster under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mocha and buster?

mocha is written in JavaScript and buster in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mocha or buster?

Choose mocha if you want the larger community (22,894 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose buster if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.