head to head · open source

mkdocs-material vs Fumadocs

mkdocs-material has 27,452 GitHub stars, 4,147 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mkdocs-material leads on adoption by 108% (27,452 vs 13,171 stars). mkdocs-material is written in Python under MIT; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. mkdocs-material has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. Fumadocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mkdocs-material ★ 27K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mkdocs-material Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mkdocs-material if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mkdocs-material profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About mkdocs-material

Material for MkDocs is a documentation framework built on top of MkDocs, the static site generator for project documentation. It lives in the Python ecosystem and is distributed as a theme plus an accompanying set of plugins, so authors write documentation in Markdown and MkDocs builds it into a static site that the theme renders. The project is licensed under MIT, has existed for eleven years, and is maintained as an open source project with more than 27,000 stars and over 4,000 forks on GitHub.

read the full mkdocs-material overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs mkdocs-material storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

mkdocs-material vs storybook mkdocs-material vs Understand-Anything mkdocs-material vs devdocs mkdocs-material vs docsify mkdocs-material vs wiki mkdocs-material vs BookStack mkdocs-material vs deepwiki-open mkdocs-material vs Docs mkdocs-material vs jsdoc mkdocs-material vs Skill_Seekers mkdocs-material vs gollum mkdocs-material vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is mkdocs-material or Fumadocs more popular?

mkdocs-material has 27,452 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. mkdocs-material has the larger community by that measure.

Are mkdocs-material and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. mkdocs-material is licensed under MIT and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mkdocs-material and Fumadocs?

mkdocs-material is written in Python and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mkdocs-material or Fumadocs?

Choose mkdocs-material if you want the larger community (27,452 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.