head to head · open source
Metabase vs britecharts
Metabase has 50,114 GitHub stars, 6,968 forks, 4,346 open issues and last shipped yesterday. britecharts has 3,719 stars, 215 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Metabase leads on adoption by 1,248% (50,114 vs 3,719 stars). Metabase is written in Clojure under a custom or non-standard licence; britecharts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Metabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, britecharts 6%. Metabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Metabase | britecharts | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Clojure | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.0K | ⑂ 215 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Metabase if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Clojure
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick britecharts if
- You want the britecharts feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and britecharts fits your workflow better
About Metabase
Metabase Metabase is the easy, open source way for everyone in your company to ask questions and learn from data. Get started The easiest way to get started with Metabase is to sign up for a free trial of Metabase Cloud. You get expert support, backups, upgrades, an SMTP server, SSL certificate, SoC2 Type 2 security auditing, and more (plus your money goes toward improving a major open source project). Check out our quick overview of cloud vs self hosting. If you need to, you can always switch to self hosting Metabase at any time (or vice versa). Key Features Set up in five minutes (we're not kidding), or have…
read the full Metabase overview →
About britecharts
Britecharts Britecharts is a client side reusable Charting Library based on [D3.js v5][1] that offers easy and intuitive use of charts and components that can be composed together to create amazing visualizations. Britecharts [components][32] have been written in ES2016 with a Test Driven methodology, so they are fully tested , and we are committed to keeping them that way. Key Features Reusability Composability Great design Usage The typical use of Britecharts involves creating a chart using its simple API, then rendering it on a container which has previously had data applied to it. The code will look like…
read the full britecharts overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Metabase or britecharts more popular?
Metabase has 50,114 GitHub stars and britecharts has 3,719. Metabase has the larger community by that measure.
Are Metabase and britecharts free?
Both are open source. Metabase has no licence declared in this registry, and britecharts is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Metabase and britecharts?
Metabase is written in Clojure and britecharts in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Metabase or britecharts?
Choose Metabase if you want the larger community (50,114 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose britecharts if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.