head to head · open source
Metabase vs AAChartKit-Swift
Metabase has 50,114 GitHub stars, 6,968 forks, 4,346 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AAChartKit-Swift has 2,523 stars, 263 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Metabase leads on adoption by 1,886% (50,114 vs 2,523 stars). Metabase is written in Clojure under a custom or non-standard licence; AAChartKit-Swift is written in Swift under MIT. Metabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, AAChartKit-Swift 10%. Metabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (data-analysis, data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Metabase | AAChartKit-Swift | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Clojure | Swift |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-04-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.0K | ⑂ 263 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Metabase if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Clojure
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AAChartKit-Swift if
- You want the AAChartKit-Swift feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You evaluated both and AAChartKit-Swift fits your workflow better
About Metabase
Metabase Metabase is the easy, open source way for everyone in your company to ask questions and learn from data. Get started The easiest way to get started with Metabase is to sign up for a free trial of Metabase Cloud. You get expert support, backups, upgrades, an SMTP server, SSL certificate, SoC2 Type 2 security auditing, and more (plus your money goes toward improving a major open source project). Check out our quick overview of cloud vs self hosting. If you need to, you can always switch to self hosting Metabase at any time (or vice versa). Key Features Set up in five minutes (we're not kidding), or have…
read the full Metabase overview →
About AAChartKit-Swift
AAInfographics English Document 🇬🇧 简体中文文档 🇨🇳 There is the link of Objective C version of AAChartKit as follow Preface AAInfographics is the Swift language version of AAChartKit which is object oriented, a set of easy to use, extremely elegant graphics drawing controls,based on the popular open source front end chart library Highcharts . It makes it very fast to add interactive charts to your mobile projects. It supports single touch drag for data inspection, multi touch for zooming, and advanced responsiveness for your apps . Features 🎂 Environment friendly . Support iOS 、 iPadOS and macOS . Totally support…
read the full AAChartKit-Swift overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Metabase or AAChartKit-Swift more popular?
Metabase has 50,114 GitHub stars and AAChartKit-Swift has 2,523. Metabase has the larger community by that measure.
Are Metabase and AAChartKit-Swift free?
Both are open source. Metabase has no licence declared in this registry, and AAChartKit-Swift is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Metabase and AAChartKit-Swift?
Metabase is written in Clojure and AAChartKit-Swift in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Metabase or AAChartKit-Swift?
Choose Metabase if you want the larger community (50,114 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose AAChartKit-Swift if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.