head to head · open source

Medusa vs paylinks

Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars, 5,487 forks, 194 open issues and last shipped yesterday. paylinks has 1,876 stars, 491 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Medusa leads on adoption by 1,875% (37,059 vs 1,876 stars). Medusa is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; paylinks is written in C# under MIT. Medusa has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, paylinks 26%. Medusa was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Medusa ★ 37K paylinks ★ 1.9K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Medusa paylinks
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.9K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-11-02 2025-11-24
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 491
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Medusa if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Medusa profile →

pick paylinks if

  • You want the paylinks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and paylinks fits your workflow better

full paylinks profile →

About Medusa

Medusa Documentation Website Building blocks for digital commerce Getting Started The fastest way to get started is with Medusa Cloud. It provides a managed environment optimized for Medusa applications, with automated deployments, scaling, and maintenance. Get started on Medusa Cloud To set up a Medusa application locally, visit the Documentation. About Medusa Medusa is a commerce platform with a built in framework for customization that allows you to build custom commerce applications without reinventing core commerce logic. The framework and modules can be used to support advanced B2B or DTC commerce stores…

read the full Medusa overview →

About paylinks

Paylinks [github action image]: [github action url]: [license image]: [![Build status][github action image]][github action url] [![MIT][license image]](LICENSE.md) 一套基于 现代 .NET 开发,支持跨平台、多商户的第三方支付SDK。 为简化开发者接入第三方支付平台而设计的SDK, 支持支付宝和微信支付,便于快速集成支付功能。 开发环境 Rider / Visual Studio .NET 10.0 运行环境 .NET 8.0 .NET 9.0 .NET 10.0 配置选项 AlipayClientOptions WeChatPayClientOptions 示例 Razor Pages 原 Paylink V4 赞助 赞助名单 社区互助 如果您在使用的过程中碰到问题,可以通过下面几个途径寻求帮助,同时我们也鼓励资深用户通过下面的途径给新人提供帮助。 QQ交流群: 522457525 加入链接 钉钉交流群: 34090889 加入链接 飞书交流群: 加入链接

read the full paylinks overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More E-commerce Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the E-commerce Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Medusa or paylinks more popular?

Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars and paylinks has 1,876. Medusa has the larger community by that measure.

Are Medusa and paylinks free?

Both are open source. Medusa has no licence declared in this registry, and paylinks is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Medusa and paylinks?

Medusa is written in TypeScript and paylinks in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Medusa or paylinks?

Choose Medusa if you want the larger community (37,059 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose paylinks if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.