head to head · open source
Medusa vs pay
Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars, 5,487 forks, 194 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pay has 5,375 stars, 1,054 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Medusa leads on adoption by 589% (37,059 vs 5,375 stars). Medusa is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; pay is written in PHP under MIT. Medusa has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, pay 20%. Medusa was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Medusa | pay | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 5.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.5K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Medusa if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pay if
- You want the pay feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and pay fits your workflow better
About Medusa
Medusa Documentation Website Building blocks for digital commerce Getting Started The fastest way to get started is with Medusa Cloud. It provides a managed environment optimized for Medusa applications, with automated deployments, scaling, and maintenance. Get started on Medusa Cloud To set up a Medusa application locally, visit the Documentation. About Medusa Medusa is a commerce platform with a built in framework for customization that allows you to build custom commerce applications without reinventing core commerce logic. The framework and modules can be used to support advanced B2B or DTC commerce stores…
read the full Medusa overview →
About pay
前言 v3 版与 v2 版在底层有很大的不同，基础架构做了重新的设计，更易扩展，使用起来更方便。 开发了多次支付宝与微信支付后，很自然产生一种反感，惰性又来了，想在网上找相关的轮子，可是一直没有找到一款自己觉得逞心如意的，要么使用起来太难理解，要么文件结构太杂乱，只有自己撸起袖子干了。 欢迎 Star，欢迎 PR！ hyperf 扩展包请 传送至这里 laravel 扩展包请 传送至这里 yii 扩展包请 传送至这里 特点 多租户支持 Swoole 支持 灵活的插件机制 丰富的事件系统 命名不那么乱七八糟 隐藏开发者不需要关注的细节 根据支付宝、微信最新 API 开发而成 高度抽象的类，免去各种拼json与xml的痛苦 文件结构清晰易理解，可以随心所欲添加本项目中没有的支付网关 方法使用更优雅，不必再去研究那些奇怪的的方法名或者类名是做啥用的 内置自动获取微信公共证书方法，再也不用再费劲去考虑第一次获取证书的的问题了 符合 PSR2、PSR3、PSR4、PSR7、PSR11、PSR14、PSR18 等各项标准，你可以各种方便的与你的框架集成 版本计划 详细文档 支持的支付方法 yansongda/pay 100% 兼容 支付宝/微信/银联 所有功能（包括服务商功能），只需通过「插件机制」引入即可。 同时，SDK 直接支持内置了以下插件，详情请查阅文档。 支付宝 电脑支付 手机网站支付 APP 支付 刷卡支付 扫码支付…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More E-commerce Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the E-commerce Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Medusa or pay more popular?
Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars and pay has 5,375. Medusa has the larger community by that measure.
Are Medusa and pay free?
Both are open source. Medusa has no licence declared in this registry, and pay is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Medusa and pay?
Medusa is written in TypeScript and pay in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Medusa or pay?
Choose Medusa if you want the larger community (37,059 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose pay if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.