head to head · open source

Medusa vs flamingo-commerce

Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars, 5,487 forks, 194 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flamingo-commerce has 598 stars, 96 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Medusa leads on adoption by 6,097% (37,059 vs 598 stars). Medusa is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; flamingo-commerce is written in Go under MIT. Medusa has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, flamingo-commerce 16%. Medusa was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (commerce, ecommerce, framework), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Medusa ★ 37K flamingo-commerce ★ 598 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Medusa flamingo-commerce
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 598
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 96
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Medusa if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Medusa profile →

pick flamingo-commerce if

  • You want the flamingo-commerce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and flamingo-commerce fits your workflow better

full flamingo-commerce profile →

About Medusa

Medusa Documentation Website Building blocks for digital commerce Getting Started The fastest way to get started is with Medusa Cloud. It provides a managed environment optimized for Medusa applications, with automated deployments, scaling, and maintenance. Get started on Medusa Cloud To set up a Medusa application locally, visit the Documentation. About Medusa Medusa is a commerce platform with a built in framework for customization that allows you to build custom commerce applications without reinventing core commerce logic. The framework and modules can be used to support advanced B2B or DTC commerce stores…

read the full Medusa overview →

About flamingo-commerce

Flamingo Commerce With "Flamingo Commerce" you get your toolkit for building fast and flexible commerce experience applications. A demoshop using the standalone adapters is online here you can also try the GraphQL support What problems does Flamingo Commerce solve? Modern Architecture: Break monolithic e commerce architecture to allow scaling and maintainability. Modern Architecture: Use it to build commerce for headless commerce solutions Real time commerce: Build personalized experiences without the need to cache rendered pages What are the main design goals of Flamingo Commerce? Performance : We do not want…

read the full flamingo-commerce overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More E-commerce Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the E-commerce Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Medusa or flamingo-commerce more popular?

Medusa has 37,059 GitHub stars and flamingo-commerce has 598. Medusa has the larger community by that measure.

Are Medusa and flamingo-commerce free?

Both are open source. Medusa has no licence declared in this registry, and flamingo-commerce is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Medusa and flamingo-commerce?

Medusa is written in TypeScript and flamingo-commerce in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Medusa or flamingo-commerce?

Choose Medusa if you want the larger community (37,059 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flamingo-commerce if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.