head to head · open source
Medusa vs flamingo-commerce
Medusa has 36,362 GitHub stars, 5,260 forks, 194 open issues and last shipped today. flamingo-commerce has 594 stars, 97 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Medusa leads on adoption by 6,022% (36,362 vs 594 stars). Medusa is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; flamingo-commerce is written in Go under MIT. Medusa has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, flamingo-commerce 16%. Medusa was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (commerce, ecommerce, framework), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Medusa | flamingo-commerce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 594 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Medusa if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flamingo-commerce if
- You want the flamingo-commerce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and flamingo-commerce fits your workflow better
About Medusa
Medusa is an open source e commerce framework built with Node.js and TypeScript that enables developers to construct custom commerce applications without rebuilding core commerce logic. It provides modular, pluggable backend services for products, orders, inventory, payments, and customer management, all exposed via REST and GraphQL APIs. Medusa lives in the JavaScript/Node.js ecosystem and targets developers who need full control over their storefronts and business logic while relying on battle tested, open source primitives.
read the full Medusa overview →
About flamingo-commerce
Flamingo Commerce With "Flamingo Commerce" you get your toolkit for building fast and flexible commerce experience applications. A demoshop using the standalone adapters is online here you can also try the GraphQL support What problems does Flamingo Commerce solve? Modern Architecture: Break monolithic e commerce architecture to allow scaling and maintainability. Modern Architecture: Use it to build commerce for headless commerce solutions Real time commerce: Build personalized experiences without the need to cache rendered pages What are the main design goals of Flamingo Commerce? Performance : We do not want to…
read the full flamingo-commerce overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More E-commerce Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the E-commerce Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Medusa or flamingo-commerce more popular?
Medusa has 36,362 GitHub stars and flamingo-commerce has 594. Medusa has the larger community by that measure.
Are Medusa and flamingo-commerce free?
Both are open source. Medusa has no licence declared in this registry, and flamingo-commerce is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Medusa and flamingo-commerce?
Medusa is written in TypeScript and flamingo-commerce in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Medusa or flamingo-commerce?
Choose Medusa if you want the larger community (36,362 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flamingo-commerce if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.