head to head · open source

Matomo vs Lua.sh

Matomo has 21,880 GitHub stars, 2,896 forks, 2,578 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lua.sh has 340 stars, 65 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Matomo leads on adoption by 6,335% (21,880 vs 340 stars). Matomo is written in PHP under GPL-3.0; Lua.sh is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. Matomo has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Lua.sh 19%. Matomo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Matomo ★ 22K Lua.sh ★ 340 category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Matomo Lua.sh
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 340
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in PHP PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 65
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Matomo if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Matomo profile →

pick Lua.sh if

  • You want the Lua.sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Lua.sh fits your workflow better

full Lua.sh profile →

About Matomo

Matomo is an open source digital analytics platform for websites and apps, formerly known as Piwik. It lives in the PHP and MySQL web analytics ecosystem, and the provided description positions it as an open alternative to Google Analytics and Amplitude. The project lets an organization collect, visualise, and analyse visitor data from its own digital properties.

read the full Matomo overview →

About Lua.sh

Lua.sh is an open source, self hostable URL shortener built on Laravel, Vue 3, and Inertia.js, aimed at individuals and teams who want branded, trackable links running on infrastructure they control.

read the full Lua.sh overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

posthog vs matomo umami vs matomo plausible vs matomo posthog vs umami posthog vs plausible umami vs plausible posthog vs rybbit umami vs rybbit crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Matomo vs PostHog Matomo vs Umami Matomo vs Plausible Matomo vs Rybbit Matomo vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Matomo vs Fathom Lite Matomo vs firebase-ios-sdk Matomo vs Countly Matomo vs shynet Matomo vs tianji Matomo vs OpenWebAnalytics Matomo vs talivia

Frequently asked questions

Is Matomo or Lua.sh more popular?

Matomo has 21,880 GitHub stars and Lua.sh has 340. Matomo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Matomo and Lua.sh free?

Both are open source. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lua.sh under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Matomo and Lua.sh?

Matomo is written in PHP and Lua.sh in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Matomo or Lua.sh?

Choose Matomo if you want the larger community (21,880 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Lua.sh if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.