head to head · open source

Typebot vs magic

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars, 3,207 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. magic has 1,192 stars, 176 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Typebot leads on adoption by 768% (10,341 vs 1,192 stars). Typebot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; magic is written in C# under MIT. Typebot has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. magic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Typebot ★ 10K magic ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Typebot magic
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 1.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Typebot if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Typebot profile →

pick magic if

  • You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better

full magic profile →

About Typebot

Typebot is Fair Source chatbot builder. Users create advanced chatbots visually. Chatbots embed in web and mobile apps. Results collect in real time. Project lives in self hosted chatbot, conversational bot, form builder ecosystem. Stack uses TypeScript, Next.js, TailwindCSS. GitHub topics include chat application, chatbot, conversational bots, form builder, nextjs, tailwindcss.

read the full Typebot overview →

About magic

Magic is an MIT licensed low code platform and MCP server, written in C for .NET 10, that turns plain English into a working full stack application — database, secure API, business logic and frontend — running on your own hardware with no vendor lock in.

read the full magic overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Typebot vs n8n Typebot vs ProxmoxVE Typebot vs ActivePieces Typebot vs LiveKit Typebot vs amis Typebot vs Windmill Typebot vs Botpress Typebot vs mitosis Typebot vs Automatisch Typebot vs puck Typebot vs cadence Typebot vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Typebot or magic more popular?

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars and magic has 1,192. Typebot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Typebot and magic free?

Both are open source. Typebot has no licence declared in this registry, and magic is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Typebot and magic?

Typebot is written in TypeScript and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Typebot or magic?

Choose Typebot if you want the larger community (10,341 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.