head to head · open source
Automatisch vs magic
Automatisch has 14,007 GitHub stars, 1,063 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. magic has 1,223 stars, 178 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Automatisch leads on adoption by 1,045% (14,007 vs 1,223 stars). Automatisch is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; magic is written in C# under MIT. Automatisch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. magic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (low-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Automatisch | magic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-02-11 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 178 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Automatisch if
- You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic if
- You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better
About Automatisch
Automatisch Open Source Zapier Alternative 🧐 Automatisch is a business automation tool that lets you connect different services like Twitter, Slack, and more to automate your business processes. 💸 Automating your workflows doesn't have to be a difficult or expensive process. You also don't need any programming knowledge to use Automatisch. Advantages There are other existing solutions in the market, like Zapier and Integromat, so you might be wondering why you should use Automatisch. ✅ One of the main benefits of using Automatisch is that it allows you to store your data on your own servers, which is essential…
read the full Automatisch overview →
About magic
Instant SECURE Full Stack Apps and AI Agents Turn plain English into a working full stack app — database, secure API, business logic, and frontend — running on your own hardware , with zero lock in . An open source alternative to Lovable, Bolt, and Replit that gives you the whole backend, plus an MCP server that turns every endpoint into a tool for Claude, Cursor, or Codex. Read more about Hyperlambda. [ ] Run it in 60 seconds Then open localhost:5555 , point it at localhost:4444 , and log in with root / root . Point the API Wizard at your database, and it generates a complete, secured REST API — then extend it…
read the full magic overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Automatisch or magic more popular?
Automatisch has 14,007 GitHub stars and magic has 1,223. Automatisch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Automatisch and magic free?
Both are open source. Automatisch has no licence declared in this registry, and magic is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Automatisch and magic?
Automatisch is written in JavaScript and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Automatisch or magic?
Choose Automatisch if you want the larger community (14,007 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.