head to head · open source

lynis vs pwndoc

lynis has 16,355 GitHub stars, 1,635 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pwndoc has 2,895 stars, 519 forks, 122 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. lynis leads on adoption by 465% (16,355 vs 2,895 stars). lynis is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; pwndoc is written in JavaScript under MIT. lynis has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pwndoc 18%. lynis was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lynis ★ 16K pwndoc ★ 2.9K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lynis pwndoc
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 2.9K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Shell JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 519
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lynis if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lynis profile →

pick pwndoc if

  • You want the pwndoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pwndoc fits your workflow better

full pwndoc profile →

About lynis

Lynis is an agentless, GPL 3.0 security auditing and hardening tool that runs on the UNIX based system itself, built for system administrators, auditors, security officers, and penetration testers who need to assess security defenses and test compliance against standards such as ISO27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.

read the full lynis overview →

About pwndoc

PwnDoc is a JavaScript pentest reporting application released under the MIT license. It lives in the information security and penetration testing ecosystem, and it is positioned as a tool for audit work, vulnerability reporting, and compliance or risk management workflows. The project describes itself as a pentest report generator, with the stated aim of helping users spend more time testing and less time documenting by sharing data such as vulnerabilities among users.

read the full pwndoc overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

lynis vs lighthouse lynis vs teleport lynis vs prowler lynis vs gs-quant lynis vs opa lynis vs Amphion lynis vs checkov lynis vs kyverno lynis vs aircrack-ng lynis vs tfsec lynis vs rundeck lynis vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is lynis or pwndoc more popular?

lynis has 16,355 GitHub stars and pwndoc has 2,895. lynis has the larger community by that measure.

Are lynis and pwndoc free?

Both are open source. lynis is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pwndoc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lynis and pwndoc?

lynis is written in Shell and pwndoc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lynis or pwndoc?

Choose lynis if you want the larger community (16,355 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pwndoc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.