head to head · open source

lux vs katana

lux has 31,686 GitHub stars, 3,312 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. katana has 17,518 stars, 1,183 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 81% (31,686 vs 17,518 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; katana is written in Go under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K katana ★ 18K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux katana
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick katana if

  • You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better

full katana profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs lux crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs Scrapling lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs changedetection.io lux vs CloakBrowser lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs crawlee lux vs colly lux vs stagehand lux vs proxy_pool lux vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or katana more popular?

lux has 31,686 GitHub stars and katana has 17,518. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and katana free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and katana?

lux is written in Go and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or katana?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,686 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.