head to head · open source

lotti vs agentrq

lotti has 1,175 GitHub stars, 119 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped today. agentrq has 1,123 stars, 80 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. lotti leads on adoption by 5% (1,175 vs 1,123 stars). lotti is written in Dart under GPL-3.0; agentrq is written in Go under Apache-2.0. lotti has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, agentrq 7%. agentrq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic-ai, agentic-workflow), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lotti ★ 1.2K agentrq ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lotti agentrq
GitHub stars ★ 1.2K ★ 1.1K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Dart Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 119 ⑂ 80
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lotti if

  • You weight community size — 1.2K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lotti profile →

pick agentrq if

  • You want the agentrq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agentrq fits your workflow better

full agentrq profile →

About lotti

Lotti is an open source, end to end encrypted logbook for individuals who want a private, local first record of the work they actually did, staffed by persistent AI agents that read what is recorded and propose the next change for the user to approve.

read the full lotti overview →

About agentrq

AgentRQ is a self hosted, Apache 2.0 human in the loop task manager that gives human operators and AI agents one shared workspace over the Model Context Protocol, aimed at people who run their own Claude subscriptions or any agent harness with ACP support.

read the full agentrq overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

lotti vs vibe-kanban lotti vs Wekan lotti vs qinglong lotti vs edict lotti vs OpenProject lotti vs onedev lotti vs Planka lotti vs Leantime lotti vs kanboard lotti vs Kaneo lotti vs ccpm lotti vs Fizzy

Frequently asked questions

Is lotti or agentrq more popular?

lotti has 1,175 GitHub stars and agentrq has 1,123. lotti has the larger community by that measure.

Are lotti and agentrq free?

Both are open source. lotti is licensed under GPL-3.0 and agentrq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lotti and agentrq?

lotti is written in Dart and agentrq in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lotti or agentrq?

Choose lotti if you want the larger community (1,175 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose agentrq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.