head to head · open source
LobeChat vs xiaozhi-android-client
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xiaozhi-android-client has 1,653 stars, 420 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 4,964% (83,716 vs 1,653 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; xiaozhi-android-client is written in Dart under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, xiaozhi-android-client 25%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | xiaozhi-android-client | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 420 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xiaozhi-android-client if
- You want the xiaozhi-android-client feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and xiaozhi-android-client fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About xiaozhi-android-client
中文 English Tiếng Việt 元旦更新 小智 AI 助手 · 全端客户端 Android · iOS · HarmonyOS · Web · Windows · macOS · Linux 基于小智AI的实时语音对话应用 · 支持实时语音交互与文字对话 🎉 新版本已发布，敬请体验！ Flutter iOS 与 Android 回音消除已实现， 欢迎大家 PR 。 Dify 支持发送图片交互，可添加多个小智智能体到聊天列表。 觉得项目对您有用的，可以赞赏一下 —— 您的每一次赞赏都是我前进的动力。 📌 版本导览 可自行打包APK、IOS、WEB、PC、鸿蒙 HAP 版本 观看 demo 视频点击跳转 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血鸿蒙（支持3D模型） 观看视频点击跳转 当前项目包含两条产品线，定位不同，可按场景选择： 🟦 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血安卓 + 纯血鸿蒙（商业版赠送） 面向 AI 终端 / AI 硬件 / 智能体方向 ，包含两个原生版本： 纯血安卓版 、 纯血鸿蒙版 。购买商业版即可获赠。 💼 V3 商业版 · 全功能跨平台客户端 基于 Flutter，覆盖 Android、iOS、HarmonyOS、Web、Windows、macOS、Linux， 也适配鸿蒙，支持编译 HAP 包 。主打 全功能、全平台 ，深度适配自研服务端。 🟦 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血安卓 +…
read the full xiaozhi-android-client overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or xiaozhi-android-client more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and xiaozhi-android-client has 1,653. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and xiaozhi-android-client free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and xiaozhi-android-client is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and xiaozhi-android-client?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and xiaozhi-android-client in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or xiaozhi-android-client?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose xiaozhi-android-client if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.