head to head · open source
LobeChat vs nanobot
LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars, 15,891 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nanobot has 48,274 stars, 8,533 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 71% (82,547 vs 48,274 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; nanobot is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, nanobot 18%. nanobot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | nanobot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 83K | ★ 48K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 8.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nanobot if
- You want the nanobot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and nanobot fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.
read the full LobeChat overview →
About nanobot
nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python, aimed at individual developers and small teams who want to run their own agent through a browser WebUI, a terminal, or chat apps instead of renting a hosted assistant.
read the full nanobot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or nanobot more popular?
LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars and nanobot has 48,274. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and nanobot free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and nanobot is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and nanobot?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and nanobot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or nanobot?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,547 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose nanobot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.