head to head · open source
LobeChat vs wisp-science
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wisp-science has 1,062 stars, 108 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 7,783% (83,716 vs 1,062 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; wisp-science is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, wisp-science 10%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | wisp-science | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wisp-science if
- You want the wisp-science feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wisp-science fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About wisp-science
Wisp Science The open source, local first AI research workbench. WISP — Workspace for Intelligent Scientific Practice English · 简体中文 · Website · Releases Search the literature, run Python and R, query 80 scientific databases, and keep the trail — figures, runs, decisions, and drafts — in one project. Your data, conversations, and credentials stay on your machines. Bring your own model. Keep your science. What you can do An agent that does the work Bring OpenAI compatible or Anthropic models, or drive Codex / Claude Code over ACP. The agent reads and writes project files, runs shell, and loads reusable Skills (…
read the full wisp-science overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or wisp-science more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and wisp-science has 1,062. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and wisp-science free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and wisp-science is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and wisp-science?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and wisp-science in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or wisp-science?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose wisp-science if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.