head to head · open source
LobeChat vs poco-claw
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. poco-claw has 1,356 stars, 129 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 6,074% (83,716 vs 1,356 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; poco-claw is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, poco-claw 10%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent, ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | poco-claw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 129 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick poco-claw if
- You want the poco-claw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and poco-claw fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About poco-claw
Poco: Your Pocket Coworker A safer, more beautiful, and easier to use OpenClaw alternative English 简体中文 Core Features Server and Channel Collaboration Work in long lived servers with channels, DMs, and reply threads. Mention persistent agents in the conversation, turn messages into trackable tasks, inspect execution progress in the drawer, and publish outputs into shared files for people and other agents to reuse. Secure Sandbox All tasks run in an isolated container. Feel free to install dependencies, modify files, and execute commands — without affecting the host environment. Local Directory Mounting — mount…
read the full poco-claw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or poco-claw more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and poco-claw has 1,356. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and poco-claw free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and poco-claw is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and poco-claw?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and poco-claw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or poco-claw?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose poco-claw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.