head to head · open source
LobeChat vs pentestagent
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentestagent has 3,232 stars, 644 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 2,490% (83,716 vs 3,232 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; pentestagent is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, pentestagent 20%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | pentestagent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 3.2K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 644 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pentestagent if
- You want the pentestagent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and pentestagent fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About pentestagent
PentestAgent AI Penetration Testing Requirements Python 3.10+ API key for OpenAI, Anthropic, or other LiteLLM supported provider Install Configure Create .env in the project root: Or for OpenAI: Any LiteLLM supported model works. Using a relay / custom API base Point PentestAgent at any OpenAI compatible endpoint via OPENAI API BASE : For Anthropic compatible endpoints use ANTHROPIC API BASE instead. See .env.example for full provider notes and embedding options. Run Docker Run tools inside a Docker container for isolation and pre installed pentesting tools. Option 1: Pull pre built image (fastest) Option 2…
read the full pentestagent overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or pentestagent more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and pentestagent has 3,232. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and pentestagent free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and pentestagent is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and pentestagent?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and pentestagent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or pentestagent?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose pentestagent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.