head to head · open source

LobeChat vs gptme

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars, 15,891 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gptme has 4,416 stars, 432 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 1,769% (82,547 vs 4,416 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; gptme is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, gptme 10%. gptme was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent, chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 83K gptme ★ 4.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat gptme
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 4.4K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 432
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick gptme if

  • You want the gptme feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and gptme fits your workflow better

full gptme profile →

About LobeChat

LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.

read the full LobeChat overview →

About gptme

gptme is a free and open source, provider agnostic AI agent that runs in any terminal — on a laptop, over SSH, in tmux, on headless servers, or in CI pipelines — and is aimed at developers and knowledge workers who want a local first coding and automation assistant they can extend into persistent autonomous agents.

read the full gptme overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

LobeChat vs OpenClaw LobeChat vs Hermes Agent LobeChat vs Open WebUI LobeChat vs AnythingLLM LobeChat vs Cherry Studio LobeChat vs nanobot LobeChat vs Jan LobeChat vs LibreChat LobeChat vs chatbox LobeChat vs AstrBot LobeChat vs openhuman LobeChat vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or gptme more popular?

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars and gptme has 4,416. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and gptme free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and gptme is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and gptme?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and gptme in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or gptme?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,547 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose gptme if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.