head to head · open source
LobeChat vs gptme
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gptme has 4,467 stars, 467 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 1,774% (83,716 vs 4,467 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; gptme is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, gptme 10%. gptme was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agent, chatgpt, deepseek), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | gptme | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 467 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gptme if
- You want the gptme feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gptme fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About gptme
gptme /ʤiː piː tiː miː/ what does it stand for? Getting Started • Downloads • Website • Documentation 📜 A personal AI agent that runs anywhere a terminal runs — your laptop, ssh sessions, tmux, headless servers, CI pipelines. Provider agnostic, local first, and unconstrained: ships with shell, Python, web, vision, and everything else an agent needs. A great coding agent, but general purpose enough to assist in all kinds of knowledge work. Free and open source. Works with Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, or fully local via llama.cpp — your data, your models, your terminal. A capable…
read the full gptme overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or gptme more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and gptme has 4,467. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and gptme free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and gptme is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and gptme?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and gptme in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or gptme?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose gptme if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.