head to head · open source
LobeChat vs FLUJO
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FLUJO has 671 stars, 92 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 12,376% (83,716 vs 671 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; FLUJO is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, FLUJO 14%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude, gemini), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | FLUJO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 671 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 92 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FLUJO if
- You want the FLUJO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FLUJO fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About FLUJO
FLUJO Build private AI agents visually. Run them your way. Connect your AIs and apps, build an agent, then talk to it, automate it, or call it from other software. FLUJO is open source and local first. Start with the guided setup, build agents as simple step by step recipes or expert visual flows, inspect every run, and expose the same agents through OpenAI compatible and MCP endpoints — while your keys and data stay under your control. Simple + visual builders · MCP native · Multi model · Built in debugger · Automation Visit flujo.com.co → · Watch the 2:28 product film → · Install FLUJO ↓ · Explore features ↓ ·…
read the full FLUJO overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or FLUJO more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and FLUJO has 671. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and FLUJO free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and FLUJO is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and FLUJO?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and FLUJO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or FLUJO?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FLUJO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.