head to head · open source

LiveKit vs joint

LiveKit has 21,000 GitHub stars, 2,354 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. joint has 5,386 stars, 893 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. LiveKit leads on adoption by 290% (21,000 vs 5,386 stars). LiveKit is written in Go under Apache-2.0; joint is written in JavaScript under MPL-2.0. LiveKit has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, joint 17%. LiveKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LiveKit ★ 21K joint ★ 5.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LiveKit joint
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 5.4K
License Apache-2.0 MPL-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 893
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LiveKit if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LiveKit profile →

pick joint if

  • You want the joint feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and joint fits your workflow better

full joint profile →

About LiveKit

LiveKit is an open source realtime infrastructure project for voice, video, and physical AI agents, and it lives in the WebRTC, media server, and voice AI ecosystem. The repository contains the LiveKit server, a scalable distributed WebRTC SFU written in Go and built on Pion WebRTC. It moves realtime audio, video, and data between people, devices, and AI models, while SDKs, agent frameworks, and companion services are provided separately.

read the full LiveKit overview →

About joint

JointJS is an MPL 2.0 licensed, SVG based JavaScript and TypeScript diagramming library for teams building production scale diagramming UIs such as AI workflow builders, BPMN modelers, SCADA/HMI dashboards, and data modeling tools.

read the full joint overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

LiveKit vs n8n LiveKit vs ProxmoxVE LiveKit vs ActivePieces LiveKit vs amis LiveKit vs Windmill LiveKit vs Botpress LiveKit vs mitosis LiveKit vs Automatisch LiveKit vs puck LiveKit vs Typebot LiveKit vs cadence LiveKit vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is LiveKit or joint more popular?

LiveKit has 21,000 GitHub stars and joint has 5,386. LiveKit has the larger community by that measure.

Are LiveKit and joint free?

Both are open source. LiveKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and joint under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LiveKit and joint?

LiveKit is written in Go and joint in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LiveKit or joint?

Choose LiveKit if you want the larger community (21,000 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose joint if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.