head to head · open source
LiveKit vs cenit
LiveKit has 21,000 GitHub stars, 2,354 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cenit has 503 stars, 133 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. LiveKit leads on adoption by 4,075% (21,000 vs 503 stars). LiveKit is written in Go under Apache-2.0; cenit is written in Ruby under MIT. LiveKit has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cenit 26%. LiveKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LiveKit | cenit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 503 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-07-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 133 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LiveKit if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cenit if
- You want the cenit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and cenit fits your workflow better
About LiveKit
LiveKit is an open source realtime infrastructure project for voice, video, and physical AI agents, and it lives in the WebRTC, media server, and voice AI ecosystem. The repository contains the LiveKit server, a scalable distributed WebRTC SFU written in Go and built on Pion WebRTC. It moves realtime audio, video, and data between people, devices, and AI models, while SDKs, agent frameworks, and companion services are provided separately.
read the full LiveKit overview →
About cenit
Cenit is a 100% open source integration platform as a service (iPaaS) written in Ruby, built for teams that design integrations, orchestrate data flows, expose APIs, and manage data pipelines across external systems without adopting a closed hosted vendor.
read the full cenit overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LiveKit or cenit more popular?
LiveKit has 21,000 GitHub stars and cenit has 503. LiveKit has the larger community by that measure.
Are LiveKit and cenit free?
Both are open source. LiveKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cenit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LiveKit and cenit?
LiveKit is written in Go and cenit in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LiveKit or cenit?
Choose LiveKit if you want the larger community (21,000 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cenit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.