head to head · open source
Lightpanda vs sequential-workflow-designer
Lightpanda has 40,882 GitHub stars, 1,999 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483 stars, 151 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 2,657% (40,882 vs 1,483 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; sequential-workflow-designer is written in TypeScript under MIT. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, sequential-workflow-designer 10%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightpanda | sequential-workflow-designer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 41K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Zig | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 151 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightpanda if
- You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Zig
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sequential-workflow-designer if
- You want the sequential-workflow-designer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and sequential-workflow-designer fits your workflow better
About Lightpanda
Lightpanda Browser The headless browser built from scratch for AI agents and automation. Not a Chromium fork. Not a WebKit patch. A new browser, written in Zig.   Benchmarks Requesting 933 real web pages over the network on a AWS EC2 m5.large instance. See benchmark details. Quick start Install Package Managers Latest nightly from Homebrew: Latest nightly from Arch Linux User Repository: Download from the nightly builds You can download the last binary from the nightly builds for Linux and MacOS for both x86 64 and aarch64. For Linux Verify the binary before running anything: Linux aarch64 is also available…
read the full Lightpanda overview →
About sequential-workflow-designer
Sequential Workflow Designer A sequential workflow designer with no external dependencies for web applications. It is written in pure TypeScript and uses SVG for rendering. This designer is not associated with any workflow engine; it is fully generic. You can use it to create any kind of application, from graphical programming languages to workflow builders. Features: No external dependencies Fully generic and configurable Supports light, dark, and soft themes, with easy customization Compatible with modern browsers and mobile devices Definitions are stored as JSON Supports Angular, React and Svelte. 📝 Check…
read the full sequential-workflow-designer overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightpanda or sequential-workflow-designer more popular?
Lightpanda has 40,882 GitHub stars and sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightpanda and sequential-workflow-designer free?
Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and sequential-workflow-designer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Lightpanda and sequential-workflow-designer?
Lightpanda is written in Zig and sequential-workflow-designer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightpanda or sequential-workflow-designer?
Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (40,882 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose sequential-workflow-designer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.