head to head · open source

Lightpanda vs OpenCCU

Lightpanda has 35,409 GitHub stars, 1,680 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCCU has 1,831 stars, 221 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 1,834% (35,409 vs 1,831 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; OpenCCU is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, OpenCCU 12%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Lightpanda ★ 35K OpenCCU ★ 1.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Lightpanda OpenCCU
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 1.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Zig JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 221
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Lightpanda if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Lightpanda profile →

pick OpenCCU if

  • You want the OpenCCU feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenCCU fits your workflow better

full OpenCCU profile →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

About OpenCCU

OpenCCU is a free, non commercial, open source Buildroot based operating system that turns Homematic IP and HomeMatic hardware into a cloud free smart home hub, aimed at owners of eQ 3 CCU3 or ELV Charly hardware, Raspberry Pi and other single board computers, and x86 64 or aarch64 hosts who want vendor grade CCU behaviour without depending on a vendor cloud.

read the full OpenCCU overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Lightpanda vs n8n Lightpanda vs Browser Use Lightpanda vs frigate Lightpanda vs ProxmoxVE Lightpanda vs ActivePieces Lightpanda vs Skyvern Lightpanda vs Automa Lightpanda vs LiveKit Lightpanda vs amis Lightpanda vs Windmill Lightpanda vs Botpress Lightpanda vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is Lightpanda or OpenCCU more popular?

Lightpanda has 35,409 GitHub stars and OpenCCU has 1,831. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.

Are Lightpanda and OpenCCU free?

Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenCCU under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Lightpanda and OpenCCU?

Lightpanda is written in Zig and OpenCCU in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Lightpanda or OpenCCU?

Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (35,409 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OpenCCU if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.