head to head · open source
Lightpanda vs gpt-home
Lightpanda has 35,418 GitHub stars, 1,681 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped today. gpt-home has 649 stars, 68 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 5,357% (35,418 vs 649 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; gpt-home is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, gpt-home 10%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightpanda | gpt-home | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 649 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Zig | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightpanda if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Zig
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gpt-home if
- You want the gpt-home feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gpt-home fits your workflow better
About Lightpanda
Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.
read the full Lightpanda overview →
About gpt-home
🏠 GPT Home 🤖💬 ChatGPT at home! Basically a better Google Nest Hub or Amazon Alexa home assistant. Built on the Raspberry P iusing LiteLLM and LangGraph. This guide will explain how to build your own. It's pretty straight forward. You can also use this as a reference for building other projects on the Raspberry Pi. Theoretically, the app should run on any linux system thanks to docker, but I can only vouch for the versions listed in the compatibility table. You should be able use any plug and play USB/3.5mm speaker or microphone as long as it's supported by ALSA or PortAudio. 📦 Integrations ✅ OpenAI ✅ Spotify …
read the full gpt-home overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightpanda or gpt-home more popular?
Lightpanda has 35,418 GitHub stars and gpt-home has 649. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightpanda and gpt-home free?
Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and gpt-home under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Lightpanda and gpt-home?
Lightpanda is written in Zig and gpt-home in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightpanda or gpt-home?
Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (35,418 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gpt-home if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.