head to head · open source
Lightpanda vs ByteChef
Lightpanda has 40,882 GitHub stars, 1,999 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ByteChef has 1,053 stars, 178 forks, 455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 3,782% (40,882 vs 1,053 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; ByteChef is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, ByteChef 17%. ByteChef was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightpanda | ByteChef | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 41K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Zig | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 178 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightpanda if
- You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Zig
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ByteChef if
- You want the ByteChef feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ByteChef fits your workflow better
About Lightpanda
Lightpanda Browser The headless browser built from scratch for AI agents and automation. Not a Chromium fork. Not a WebKit patch. A new browser, written in Zig.   Benchmarks Requesting 933 real web pages over the network on a AWS EC2 m5.large instance. See benchmark details. Quick start Install Package Managers Latest nightly from Homebrew: Latest nightly from Arch Linux User Repository: Download from the nightly builds You can download the last binary from the nightly builds for Linux and MacOS for both x86 64 and aarch64. For Linux Verify the binary before running anything: Linux aarch64 is also available…
read the full Lightpanda overview →
About ByteChef
The open source platform that unifies AI agent orchestration and workflow automation Autonomy and precision — in one platform. Documentation · Live Demo · Discord · Connect on X · Roadmap [//]: ( ) [//]: ( About ByteChef) [//]: () [//]: (ByteChef is an open source platform for AI agents, workflow automation, and API integration.) [//]: () [//]: (Instead of using separate tools for AI agents and automated workflows, ByteChef brings both into a single platform with one orchestration layer, centralized management, and enterprise grade security.) [//]: () [//]: (Built for modern enterprises, ByteChef can run in…
read the full ByteChef overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightpanda or ByteChef more popular?
Lightpanda has 40,882 GitHub stars and ByteChef has 1,053. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightpanda and ByteChef free?
Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and ByteChef has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Lightpanda and ByteChef?
Lightpanda is written in Zig and ByteChef in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightpanda or ByteChef?
Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (40,882 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ByteChef if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.