head to head · open source

LibreOffice vs PDF4QT

LibreOffice has 4,375 GitHub stars, 945 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PDF4QT has 1,477 stars, 145 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreOffice leads on adoption by 196% (4,375 vs 1,477 stars). LibreOffice is written in C++ under GPL-3.0; PDF4QT is written in C++ under MIT. LibreOffice has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, PDF4QT 10%. PDF4QT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LibreOffice ★ 4.4K PDF4QT ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LibreOffice PDF4QT
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in C++ C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 945 ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LibreOffice if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LibreOffice profile →

pick PDF4QT if

  • You want the PDF4QT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and PDF4QT fits your workflow better

full PDF4QT profile →

About LibreOffice

LibreOffice is an integrated office suite written in C++ and distributed under GPL 3.0. It lives in the open source productivity and office suite ecosystem, and it positions itself as an open alternative to Microsoft 365. The Document Foundation backs the project as a community of enterprises, developers, and volunteers.

read the full LibreOffice overview →

About PDF4QT

PDF4QT is an MIT licensed, cross platform PDF toolkit for Windows and Linux that combines dedicated desktop applications — a viewer, editor, page manipulator, document diff tool and command line utility — with a C++/Qt PDF rendering engine built against the PDF Reference 2.0, and it is aimed at end users, developers and integrators who need PDF handling they can inspect, modify and redistribute without licence friction.

read the full PDF4QT overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs libreoffice cryptpad vs libreoffice n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs ironcalc openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

LibreOffice vs CryptPad LibreOffice vs gspread LibreOffice vs ONLYOFFICE Docs LibreOffice vs bento LibreOffice vs IronCalc LibreOffice vs KillerPDF LibreOffice vs Collabora Online LibreOffice vs yft-design LibreOffice vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is LibreOffice or PDF4QT more popular?

LibreOffice has 4,375 GitHub stars and PDF4QT has 1,477. LibreOffice has the larger community by that measure.

Are LibreOffice and PDF4QT free?

Both are open source. LibreOffice is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PDF4QT under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LibreOffice and PDF4QT?

LibreOffice is written in C++ and PDF4QT in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LibreOffice or PDF4QT?

Choose LibreOffice if you want the larger community (4,375 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PDF4QT if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.