head to head · open source

LibreOffice vs Pdf_Tools

LibreOffice has 4,375 GitHub stars, 945 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pdf_Tools has 582 stars, 38 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreOffice leads on adoption by 652% (4,375 vs 582 stars). LibreOffice is written in C++ under GPL-3.0; Pdf_Tools is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. LibreOffice has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, Pdf_Tools 7%. LibreOffice was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LibreOffice ★ 4.4K Pdf_Tools ★ 582 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LibreOffice Pdf_Tools
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 582
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 945 ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LibreOffice if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LibreOffice profile →

pick Pdf_Tools if

  • You want the Pdf_Tools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Pdf_Tools fits your workflow better

full Pdf_Tools profile →

About LibreOffice

LibreOffice is an integrated office suite written in C++ and distributed under GPL 3.0. It lives in the open source productivity and office suite ecosystem, and it positions itself as an open alternative to Microsoft 365. The Document Foundation backs the project as a community of enterprises, developers, and volunteers.

read the full LibreOffice overview →

About Pdf_Tools

PDF Toolkit is an open source, privacy first PDF editor for Android, written in Kotlin and aimed at anyone who needs to merge, split, compress, convert, annotate, or sign PDF documents entirely on the device, with no internet connection and no account.

read the full Pdf_Tools overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs libreoffice cryptpad vs libreoffice n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs ironcalc openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

LibreOffice vs CryptPad LibreOffice vs gspread LibreOffice vs ONLYOFFICE Docs LibreOffice vs bento LibreOffice vs IronCalc LibreOffice vs KillerPDF LibreOffice vs Collabora Online LibreOffice vs yft-design LibreOffice vs PDF4QT LibreOffice vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is LibreOffice or Pdf_Tools more popular?

LibreOffice has 4,375 GitHub stars and Pdf_Tools has 582. LibreOffice has the larger community by that measure.

Are LibreOffice and Pdf_Tools free?

Both are open source. LibreOffice is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pdf_Tools under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LibreOffice and Pdf_Tools?

LibreOffice is written in C++ and Pdf_Tools in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LibreOffice or Pdf_Tools?

Choose LibreOffice if you want the larger community (4,375 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pdf_Tools if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.