head to head · open source

lerna vs vmprint

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vmprint has 676 stars, 30 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. lerna leads on adoption by 5,233% (36,053 vs 676 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; vmprint is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, vmprint 4%. lerna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K vmprint ★ 676 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna vmprint
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 676
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 30
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick vmprint if

  • You want the vmprint feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and vmprint fits your workflow better

full vmprint profile →

About lerna

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.

read the full lerna overview →

About vmprint

VMPrint is an Apache 2.0 layout engine written in JavaScript that decides where every glyph goes and returns a flat array of exact X/Y coordinates, built for teams creating Canvas or WebGL tools, high volume report generators, print on demand pipelines, document editors, and edge runtime deployments.

read the full vmprint overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web lerna vs LibreTranslate lerna vs PyMuPDF lerna vs so-novel lerna vs papermill lerna vs Calibre-Web-Automated lerna vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or vmprint more popular?

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and vmprint has 676. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and vmprint free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and vmprint under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and vmprint?

lerna is written in TypeScript and vmprint in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or vmprint?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose vmprint if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.