head to head · open source

lerna vs vmprint

lerna has 36,041 GitHub stars, 2,269 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. vmprint has 679 stars, 30 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. lerna leads on adoption by 5,208% (36,041 vs 679 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; vmprint is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, vmprint 4%. lerna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K vmprint ★ 679 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna vmprint
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 679
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-31 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 30
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick vmprint if

  • You want the vmprint feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and vmprint fits your workflow better

full vmprint profile →

About lerna

Important note: this project changed stewardship to Nx! Your favorite tool is alive and well: Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository. A few links to help you get started: lerna.js.org: Documentation, Guides, Interactive Tutorials Getting Started Features Official Nx and Lerna YouTube Channel Blog Posts About Lerna and Nx Engage with the Core Team and the Community Follow Lerna on Twitter Community Discord, forum channel Want to help? If you want to file a bug or submit a PR, read up on our guidelines for contributing Core…

read the full lerna overview →

About vmprint

VMPrint I built the layout engine so you don't have to. VMPrint is a layout engine. Not a PDF library. Not a renderer. A layout engine: the component that decides where every glyph goes, negotiates page breaks, resolves mutual spatial dependencies between dynamic regions, and produces a flat array of exact X/Y coordinates for every box and text run in the document. What you do with that output is your call: render to PDF, replay on a Canvas, drive a word processor's display layer, feed it to a WebGL pipeline. The engine's job ends when the math is done. The architecture is backed by a pending patent. The core…

read the full vmprint overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or vmprint more popular?

lerna has 36,041 GitHub stars and vmprint has 679. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and vmprint free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and vmprint under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and vmprint?

lerna is written in TypeScript and vmprint in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or vmprint?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,041 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose vmprint if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.