head to head · open source

lerna vs hammer-editor

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hammer-editor has 744 stars, 42 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. lerna leads on adoption by 4,746% (36,053 vs 744 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; hammer-editor is written in Kotlin under MIT. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, hammer-editor 6%. lerna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K hammer-editor ★ 744 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna hammer-editor
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 744
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 42
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick hammer-editor if

  • You want the hammer-editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and hammer-editor fits your workflow better

full hammer-editor profile →

About lerna

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.

read the full lerna overview →

About hammer-editor

Hammer is a free, open source, local first story editor for writers, built in Kotlin with Compose Multiplatform and shipped for Android, iOS, Windows, Linux and macOS, so a single draft stays with its author across phone and desktop.

read the full hammer-editor overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web lerna vs LibreTranslate lerna vs PyMuPDF lerna vs so-novel lerna vs papermill lerna vs Calibre-Web-Automated lerna vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or hammer-editor more popular?

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and hammer-editor has 744. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and hammer-editor free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and hammer-editor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and hammer-editor?

lerna is written in TypeScript and hammer-editor in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or hammer-editor?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hammer-editor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.