head to head · open source

lerna vs feather

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feather has 607 stars, 54 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lerna leads on adoption by 5,840% (36,053 vs 607 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; feather is written in Swift under MIT. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, feather 9%. feather was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (publishing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K feather ★ 607 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna feather
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 607
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick feather if

  • You want the feather feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and feather fits your workflow better

full feather profile →

About lerna

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.

read the full lerna overview →

About feather

Feather is a Swift based content management system for developers and publishing teams who want to run a blog or content site on their own infrastructure rather than through a hosted service.

read the full feather overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web lerna vs LibreTranslate lerna vs PyMuPDF lerna vs so-novel lerna vs papermill lerna vs Calibre-Web-Automated lerna vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or feather more popular?

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and feather has 607. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and feather free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and feather under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and feather?

lerna is written in TypeScript and feather in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or feather?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose feather if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.