head to head · open source

lektor vs bludit

lektor has 3,948 GitHub stars, 319 forks, 251 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bludit has 1,466 stars, 334 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. lektor leads on adoption by 169% (3,948 vs 1,466 stars). lektor is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; bludit is written in PHP under MIT. lektor has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, bludit 23%. lektor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lektor ★ 3.9K bludit ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lektor bludit
GitHub stars ★ 3.9K ★ 1.5K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python PHP
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 319 ⑂ 334
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lektor if

  • You weight community size — 3.9K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lektor profile →

pick bludit if

  • You want the bludit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and bludit fits your workflow better

full bludit profile →

About lektor

Lektor is a static website generator written in Python that builds an entire project from static files into many individual HTML pages and ships with a built in admin UI and a minimal desktop app, intended for people who want content management without running a database backed CMS.

read the full lektor overview →

About bludit

Bludit is flat file CMS. It runs in PHP web hosting ecosystem. It is categorized as Content & Publishing / Blogging & Personal Sites. It functions as blog engine, content management engine, and flat file engine. It is written in PHP and licensed under MIT.

read the full bludit overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

lektor vs next.js lektor vs nuxt lektor vs gatsby lektor vs Ghost lektor vs jekyll lektor vs hexo lektor vs nextra lektor vs kit lektor vs vike lektor vs actions-gh-pages lektor vs react-snap lektor vs hugo-theme-academic-cv

Frequently asked questions

Is lektor or bludit more popular?

lektor has 3,948 GitHub stars and bludit has 1,466. lektor has the larger community by that measure.

Are lektor and bludit free?

Both are open source. lektor is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and bludit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lektor and bludit?

lektor is written in Python and bludit in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lektor or bludit?

Choose lektor if you want the larger community (3,948 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose bludit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.