head to head · open source

lapce vs ttt

lapce has 38,904 GitHub stars, 1,347 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ttt has 514 stars, 38 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped today. lapce leads on adoption by 7,469% (38,904 vs 514 stars). lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; ttt is written in Go under MIT. lapce has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, ttt 7%. ttt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-editor, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lapce ★ 39K ttt ★ 514 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lapce ttt
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 514
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-10-09 2026-10-11
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lapce if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lapce profile →

pick ttt if

  • You want the ttt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ttt fits your workflow better

full ttt profile →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

About ttt

TTT Editor (Terminal Text Tool) is a single binary, zero config text editor that runs as a TUI in the terminal, aimed at developers who want a full featured coding environment without a GUI application.

read the full ttt overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 277K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 213K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

lapce vs ECC lapce vs react lapce vs Langflow lapce vs Supabase lapce vs puppeteer lapce vs archify lapce vs rea lapce vs PocketBase lapce vs i-have-adhd lapce vs codebase-memory-mcp lapce vs herdr lapce vs ToolJet

Frequently asked questions

Is lapce or ttt more popular?

lapce has 38,904 GitHub stars and ttt has 514. lapce has the larger community by that measure.

Are lapce and ttt free?

Both are open source. lapce is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ttt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lapce and ttt?

lapce is written in Rust and ttt in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lapce or ttt?

Choose lapce if you want the larger community (38,904 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ttt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.