head to head · open source

Langflow vs web-maker

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars, 10,119 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped today. web-maker has 2,699 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Langflow leads on adoption by 5,644% (155,023 vs 2,699 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain react vs supabase react vs pocketbase react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools Langflow vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or web-maker more popular?

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,699. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and web-maker free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and web-maker?

Langflow is written in Python and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or web-maker?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,023 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.