head to head · open source

Langflow vs tirith

Langflow has 155,398 GitHub stars, 10,153 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tirith has 2,748 stars, 97 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Langflow leads on adoption by 5,555% (155,398 vs 2,748 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; tirith is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tirith 4%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K tirith ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow tirith
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 2.7K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 97
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick tirith if

  • You want the tirith feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and tirith fits your workflow better

full tirith profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About tirith

Tirith is an AGPL 3.0 licensed terminal security tool written in Rust that intercepts commands, pasted content and scanned files before they execute, catching homograph URLs, obfuscated payloads, credential exfiltration and malicious AI skills or configs for developers and AI agents working in the shell.

read the full tirith overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs supabase react vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs herdr Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or tirith more popular?

Langflow has 155,398 GitHub stars and tirith has 2,748. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and tirith free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and tirith under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and tirith?

Langflow is written in Python and tirith in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or tirith?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,398 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tirith if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.