head to head · open source

Langflow vs mailcatcher

Langflow has 155,114 GitHub stars, 10,122 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mailcatcher has 6,780 stars, 605 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Langflow leads on adoption by 2,188% (155,114 vs 6,780 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; mailcatcher is written in Ruby under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, mailcatcher 9%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K mailcatcher ★ 6.8K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow mailcatcher
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 6.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Ruby
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 605
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick mailcatcher if

  • You want the mailcatcher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and mailcatcher fits your workflow better

full mailcatcher profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About mailcatcher

MailCatcher is a Ruby SMTP server that catches every message sent to it and serves those messages through a local web interface, and it is made for developers who need to inspect the email their application sends without delivering it to real recipients.

read the full mailcatcher overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 108K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs supabase react vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools Langflow vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or mailcatcher more popular?

Langflow has 155,114 GitHub stars and mailcatcher has 6,780. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and mailcatcher free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and mailcatcher under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and mailcatcher?

Langflow is written in Python and mailcatcher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or mailcatcher?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,114 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mailcatcher if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.