head to head · open source

Krayin vs Wraps

Krayin has 23,890 GitHub stars, 1,630 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Wraps has 59 stars, 8 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Krayin leads on adoption by 40,392% (23,890 vs 59 stars). Krayin is written in PHP under MIT; Wraps is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Krayin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Wraps 14%. Wraps was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Krayin ★ 24K Wraps ★ 59 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Krayin Wraps
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 59
License MIT Custom / other
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 8
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Krayin if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Krayin profile →

pick Wraps if

  • You want the Wraps feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Wraps fits your workflow better

full Wraps profile →

About Krayin

Krayin is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted customer relationship management framework built on Laravel and Vue.js, intended for small and medium businesses and enterprises that want to run customer, lead, and sales management on their own infrastructure.

read the full Krayin overview →

About Wraps

Wraps is a code first email platform that deploys its infrastructure into your own AWS account. It lives in the AWS and TypeScript ecosystem, and it ships as a command line tool, a set of SDKs, and an agent facing MCP server. The core idea is that sending email does not require handing your data or your billing to a third party: one CLI command provisions the resources, and the application talks to them through a typed client. SMS through AWS End User Messaging, and CDN delivery over S3 and CloudFront, follow the same pattern.

read the full Wraps overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Krayin vs duckdb Krayin vs Listmonk Krayin vs goaccess Krayin vs excelize Krayin vs claude-seo Krayin vs Billion Mail Krayin vs BillionMail Krayin vs dbt Krayin vs trino Krayin vs starrocks Krayin vs perspective Krayin vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Krayin or Wraps more popular?

Krayin has 23,890 GitHub stars and Wraps has 59. Krayin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Krayin and Wraps free?

Both are open source. Krayin is licensed under MIT, and Wraps has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Krayin and Wraps?

Krayin is written in PHP and Wraps in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Krayin or Wraps?

Choose Krayin if you want the larger community (23,890 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Wraps if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.