head to head · open source

Krayin vs Contentport

Krayin has 23,890 GitHub stars, 1,630 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Contentport has 765 stars, 107 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Krayin leads on adoption by 3,023% (23,890 vs 765 stars). Krayin is written in PHP under MIT; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Krayin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. Krayin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Krayin ★ 24K Contentport ★ 765 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Krayin Contentport
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 765
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2025-12-12
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Krayin if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Krayin profile →

pick Contentport if

  • You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better

full Contentport profile →

About Krayin

Krayin is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted customer relationship management framework built on Laravel and Vue.js, intended for small and medium businesses and enterprises that want to run customer, lead, and sales management on their own infrastructure.

read the full Krayin overview →

About Contentport

Contentport is an open source content platform for technical founders, positioned as a content engine for growing on Twitter at scale. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under AGPL 3.0, and listed under Business Software / Marketing & Customer Engagement. Its public roadmap describes scheduling, assistant prompts, thread creation, image handling, timezone behavior, and workspace isolation.

read the full Contentport overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Krayin vs duckdb Krayin vs Listmonk Krayin vs goaccess Krayin vs excelize Krayin vs claude-seo Krayin vs Billion Mail Krayin vs BillionMail Krayin vs dbt Krayin vs trino Krayin vs starrocks Krayin vs perspective Krayin vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Krayin or Contentport more popular?

Krayin has 23,890 GitHub stars and Contentport has 765. Krayin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Krayin and Contentport free?

Both are open source. Krayin is licensed under MIT and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Krayin and Contentport?

Krayin is written in PHP and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Krayin or Contentport?

Choose Krayin if you want the larger community (23,890 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.