head to head · open source

Krayin vs Contentport

Krayin has 24,096 GitHub stars, 1,677 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Contentport has 772 stars, 108 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Krayin leads on adoption by 3,021% (24,096 vs 772 stars). Krayin is written in PHP under MIT; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Krayin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. Krayin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Krayin ★ 24K Contentport ★ 772 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Krayin Contentport
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 772
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-01 2025-12-12
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 108
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Krayin if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Krayin profile →

pick Contentport if

  • You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better

full Contentport profile →

About Krayin

Topics 1. Introduction 2. Documentation 3. Requirements 4. Installation & Configuration 4. Docker Installation 5. Krayin Cloud System 6. License 7. Security Vulnerabilities Introduction Krayin CRM is a hand tailored CRM framework built on some of the hottest opensource technologies such as Laravel (a PHP framework) and Vue.js a progressive Javascript framework. Free & Opensource Laravel CRM solution for SMEs and Enterprises for complete customer lifecycle management. Read our documentation: Krayin CRM Docs We also have a forum for any type of concerns, feature requests, or discussions. Please visit: Krayin CRM…

read the full Krayin overview →

About Contentport

contentport — public roadmap (last updated: 29th Nov 2025) Features in Pipeline Priority 1 Dark mode (requested by many users) Responsive layout (requested by many users) Community posting (requested by many users) Proactively create posts for users (requested by many users) Native code snippet editor (Raycast style) — personal wish (Jo) Accurate character limit handling for free Twitter users (necessary for UX) Auto plug (potentially useful feature) Timezone selection (requested by many users) Clarify whether scheduled times reflect: Local timezone UTC Or something else Display the active timezone clearly…

read the full Contentport overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Krayin or Contentport more popular?

Krayin has 24,096 GitHub stars and Contentport has 772. Krayin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Krayin and Contentport free?

Both are open source. Krayin is licensed under MIT and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Krayin and Contentport?

Krayin is written in PHP and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Krayin or Contentport?

Choose Krayin if you want the larger community (24,096 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.