head to head · open source
koreader vs Publish-Docker-Github-Action
koreader has 30,818 GitHub stars, 2,019 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797 stars, 202 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koreader leads on adoption by 3,767% (30,818 vs 797 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; Publish-Docker-Github-Action is written in Shell under MIT. koreader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Publish-Docker-Github-Action 25%. koreader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| koreader | Publish-Docker-Github-Action | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 797 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Lua | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 202 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick koreader if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Publish-Docker-Github-Action if
- You want the Publish-Docker-Github-Action feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and Publish-Docker-Github-Action fits your workflow better
About koreader
KOReader is a document viewer primarily aimed at e ink readers. [![AGPL Licence][badge license]](COPYING) [![Latest release][badge release]][link gh releases] [![Gitter][badge gitter]][link gitter] [![Mobileread][badge mobileread]][link forum] [![Build Status][badge circleci]][link circleci] [![Coverage Status][badge coverage]][link coverage] [![Weblate Status][badge weblate]][link weblate] Download • User guide • Wiki • Developer docs Main features portable : runs on embedded devices (Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo, PocketBook, reMarkable), Android and Linux computers. Developers can run a KOReader emulator in Linux…
read the full koreader overview →
About Publish-Docker-Github-Action
Publishes docker containers This Action for Docker uses the Git branch as the Docker tag for building and pushing the container. Hereby the master branch is published as the latest tag. Usage Example pipeline Mandatory Arguments name is the name of the image you would like to push username the login username for the registry password the authentication token [preferred] or login password for the registry. If you would like to publish the image to other registries, these actions might be helpful Outputs tag is the tag, which was pushed snapshot tag is the tag that is generated by the snapshot option and pushed…
read the full Publish-Docker-Github-Action overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is koreader or Publish-Docker-Github-Action more popular?
koreader has 30,818 GitHub stars and Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797. koreader has the larger community by that measure.
Are koreader and Publish-Docker-Github-Action free?
Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Publish-Docker-Github-Action under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between koreader and Publish-Docker-Github-Action?
koreader is written in Lua and Publish-Docker-Github-Action in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, koreader or Publish-Docker-Github-Action?
Choose koreader if you want the larger community (30,818 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Publish-Docker-Github-Action if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.