head to head · open source

koreader vs Lector

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars, 1,908 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lector has 1,552 stars, 208 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. koreader leads on adoption by 1,818% (29,761 vs 1,552 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; Lector is written in Python under GPL-3.0. koreader has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Lector 13%. koreader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (djvu, ebook, ebook-reader, epub), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 30K Lector ★ 1.6K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader Lector
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 1.6K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 208
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick Lector if

  • You want the Lector feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Lector fits your workflow better

full Lector profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed document viewer written in Lua that runs on e ink readers from Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo and PocketBook, on reMarkable, and on Android and desktop Linux, aimed at readers who want broader format support, finer typesetting control and better performance than the reading software shipped with their device.

read the full koreader overview →

About Lector

Lector is a Python and Qt desktop ebook reader released under GPL 3.0 or later. It lives in the Qt and Python desktop ecosystem, and its topics describe it as a crossplatform reader for ebooks and comics. The README shows a graphical application with views for reading, table browsing, distraction free reading, comics, annotations, bookmarks, view profiles, metadata, and a dictionary.

read the full Lector overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koreader vs lerna koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre koreader vs readest koreader vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre-web koreader vs LibreTranslate koreader vs PyMuPDF koreader vs so-novel koreader vs papermill koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koreader vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or Lector more popular?

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars and Lector has 1,552. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and Lector free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Lector under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and Lector?

koreader is written in Lua and Lector in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or Lector?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (29,761 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Lector if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.