head to head · open source

koreader vs gradle-play-publisher

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars, 1,908 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gradle-play-publisher has 4,317 stars, 349 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. koreader leads on adoption by 589% (29,761 vs 4,317 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; gradle-play-publisher is written in Kotlin under MIT. koreader has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, gradle-play-publisher 8%. koreader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 30K gradle-play-publisher ★ 4.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader gradle-play-publisher
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 4.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Lua Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-26
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 349
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick gradle-play-publisher if

  • You want the gradle-play-publisher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and gradle-play-publisher fits your workflow better

full gradle-play-publisher profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed document viewer written in Lua that runs on e ink readers from Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo and PocketBook, on reMarkable, and on Android and desktop Linux, aimed at readers who want broader format support, finer typesetting control and better performance than the reading software shipped with their device.

read the full koreader overview →

About gradle-play-publisher

Gradle Play Publisher is an unofficial release automation Gradle plugin for Android applications. It connects Gradle tasks to the Google Play Developer API through a service account. The plugin is written in Kotlin and distributed under the MIT license.

read the full gradle-play-publisher overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koreader vs lerna koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre koreader vs readest koreader vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre-web koreader vs LibreTranslate koreader vs PyMuPDF koreader vs so-novel koreader vs papermill koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koreader vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or gradle-play-publisher more popular?

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars and gradle-play-publisher has 4,317. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and gradle-play-publisher free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and gradle-play-publisher under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and gradle-play-publisher?

koreader is written in Lua and gradle-play-publisher in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or gradle-play-publisher?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (29,761 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gradle-play-publisher if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.