head to head · open source

koreader vs feather

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars, 1,908 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feather has 607 stars, 54 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koreader leads on adoption by 4,803% (29,761 vs 607 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; feather is written in Swift under MIT. koreader has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, feather 9%. feather was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 30K feather ★ 607 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader feather
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 607
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Lua Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick feather if

  • You want the feather feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and feather fits your workflow better

full feather profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed document viewer written in Lua that runs on e ink readers from Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo and PocketBook, on reMarkable, and on Android and desktop Linux, aimed at readers who want broader format support, finer typesetting control and better performance than the reading software shipped with their device.

read the full koreader overview →

About feather

Feather is a Swift based content management system for developers and publishing teams who want to run a blog or content site on their own infrastructure rather than through a hosted service.

read the full feather overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koreader vs lerna koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre koreader vs readest koreader vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre-web koreader vs LibreTranslate koreader vs PyMuPDF koreader vs so-novel koreader vs papermill koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koreader vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or feather more popular?

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars and feather has 607. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and feather free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and feather under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and feather?

koreader is written in Lua and feather in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or feather?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (29,761 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose feather if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.