head to head · open source
koodo-reader vs Publish-Docker-Github-Action
koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars, 2,148 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797 stars, 202 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koodo-reader leads on adoption by 3,501% (28,699 vs 797 stars). koodo-reader is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Publish-Docker-Github-Action is written in Shell under MIT. koodo-reader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Publish-Docker-Github-Action 25%. Publish-Docker-Github-Action was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| koodo-reader | Publish-Docker-Github-Action | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 797 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.1K | ⑂ 202 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick koodo-reader if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Publish-Docker-Github-Action if
- You want the Publish-Docker-Github-Action feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and Publish-Docker-Github-Action fits your workflow better
About koodo-reader
简体中文 हिंदी Português Indonesian English Türkçe Koodo Reader A cross platform ebook reader Download Preview Roadmap Document Plugins Preview Features Format support: EPUB ( .epub ) PDF ( .pdf ) DRM free Mobipocket ( .mobi ) and Kindle ( .azw3 , .azw ) Plain text ( .txt ) FictionBook ( .fb2 ) Comic book archive ( .cbr , .cbz , .cbt , .cb7 ) Rich text ( .md , .docx ) HyperText ( .html , .xml , .xhtml , .mhtml , .htm ) Platform support: Windows , macOS , Linux , Android , iOS and Web Sync and backup your data with OneDrive , Google Drive , Dropbox , iCloud , MEGA , pCloud , Yandex Disk , Box , FTP , SFTP , WebDAV…
read the full koodo-reader overview →
About Publish-Docker-Github-Action
Publishes docker containers This Action for Docker uses the Git branch as the Docker tag for building and pushing the container. Hereby the master branch is published as the latest tag. Usage Example pipeline Mandatory Arguments name is the name of the image you would like to push username the login username for the registry password the authentication token [preferred] or login password for the registry. If you would like to publish the image to other registries, these actions might be helpful Outputs tag is the tag, which was pushed snapshot tag is the tag that is generated by the snapshot option and pushed…
read the full Publish-Docker-Github-Action overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is koodo-reader or Publish-Docker-Github-Action more popular?
koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars and Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797. koodo-reader has the larger community by that measure.
Are koodo-reader and Publish-Docker-Github-Action free?
Both are open source. koodo-reader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Publish-Docker-Github-Action under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between koodo-reader and Publish-Docker-Github-Action?
koodo-reader is written in JavaScript and Publish-Docker-Github-Action in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, koodo-reader or Publish-Docker-Github-Action?
Choose koodo-reader if you want the larger community (28,699 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Publish-Docker-Github-Action if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.