head to head · open source

koodo-reader vs feather

koodo-reader has 28,217 GitHub stars, 2,116 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feather has 607 stars, 54 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koodo-reader leads on adoption by 4,549% (28,217 vs 607 stars). koodo-reader is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; feather is written in Swift under MIT. koodo-reader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, feather 9%. feather was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koodo-reader ★ 28K feather ★ 607 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koodo-reader feather
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 607
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koodo-reader if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koodo-reader profile →

pick feather if

  • You want the feather feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and feather fits your workflow better

full feather profile →

About koodo-reader

Koodo Reader is a cross platform ebook manager and reader written in JavaScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and the web, and it is distributed both as downloadable desktop and mobile applications and as a hosted web version at web.koodoreader.com. The project lives in the JavaScript ecosystem, is developed with yarn and git, and has been maintained for roughly seven years, with a repository that carries about 28,000 stars and 2,100 forks.

read the full koodo-reader overview →

About feather

Feather is a Swift based content management system for developers and publishing teams who want to run a blog or content site on their own infrastructure rather than through a hosted service.

read the full feather overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koodo-reader koreader vs koodo-reader lerna vs koreader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koodo-reader vs lerna koodo-reader vs koreader koodo-reader vs calibre koodo-reader vs readest koodo-reader vs ebook2audiobook koodo-reader vs calibre-web koodo-reader vs LibreTranslate koodo-reader vs PyMuPDF koodo-reader vs so-novel koodo-reader vs papermill koodo-reader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koodo-reader vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is koodo-reader or feather more popular?

koodo-reader has 28,217 GitHub stars and feather has 607. koodo-reader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koodo-reader and feather free?

Both are open source. koodo-reader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and feather under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koodo-reader and feather?

koodo-reader is written in JavaScript and feather in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koodo-reader or feather?

Choose koodo-reader if you want the larger community (28,217 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose feather if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.