head to head · open source
koodo-reader vs feather
koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars, 2,148 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. feather has 609 stars, 54 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koodo-reader leads on adoption by 4,612% (28,699 vs 609 stars). koodo-reader is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; feather is written in Swift under MIT. koodo-reader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, feather 9%. feather was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| koodo-reader | feather | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 609 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Swift |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.1K | ⑂ 54 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick koodo-reader if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick feather if
- You want the feather feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You evaluated both and feather fits your workflow better
About koodo-reader
简体中文 हिंदी Português Indonesian English Türkçe Koodo Reader A cross platform ebook reader Download Preview Roadmap Document Plugins Preview Features Format support: EPUB ( .epub ) PDF ( .pdf ) DRM free Mobipocket ( .mobi ) and Kindle ( .azw3 , .azw ) Plain text ( .txt ) FictionBook ( .fb2 ) Comic book archive ( .cbr , .cbz , .cbt , .cb7 ) Rich text ( .md , .docx ) HyperText ( .html , .xml , .xhtml , .mhtml , .htm ) Platform support: Windows , macOS , Linux , Android , iOS and Web Sync and backup your data with OneDrive , Google Drive , Dropbox , iCloud , MEGA , pCloud , Yandex Disk , Box , FTP , SFTP , WebDAV…
read the full koodo-reader overview →
About feather
Feather CMS 🪶 ⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️ !WORK IN PROGRESS! ⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️ 🪶 Feather is a modern Swift based Content Management System. 💬 Click to join the chat on Discord. Make Commands Run these from the repository root: make clean Clears only the Postgres database volume and media storage volume. make reset Drops the full Compose stack, including all Compose managed volumes. make stop Stops all running services without removing them. make deps Builds and runs the current dependency services: certificates , postgres , and migrator . make application Builds the shared application artifact image once, builds the runtime images from…
read the full feather overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is koodo-reader or feather more popular?
koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars and feather has 609. koodo-reader has the larger community by that measure.
Are koodo-reader and feather free?
Both are open source. koodo-reader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and feather under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between koodo-reader and feather?
koodo-reader is written in JavaScript and feather in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, koodo-reader or feather?
Choose koodo-reader if you want the larger community (28,699 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose feather if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.