head to head · open source

i-have-adhd vs KeystoneJS

i-have-adhd has 48,794 GitHub stars, 2,838 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KeystoneJS has 9,976 stars, 1,265 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. i-have-adhd leads on adoption by 389% (48,794 vs 9,976 stars). i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT; KeystoneJS is written in TypeScript under MIT. i-have-adhd has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, KeystoneJS 13%. i-have-adhd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

i-have-adhd ★ 49K KeystoneJS ★ 10.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

i-have-adhd KeystoneJS
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 10.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full i-have-adhd profile →

pick KeystoneJS if

  • You want the KeystoneJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and KeystoneJS fits your workflow better

full KeystoneJS profile →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

About KeystoneJS

KeystoneJS is an open source Node.js CMS and application framework written in TypeScript and licensed under the MIT License. It lives in the Node.js, GraphQL, and React ecosystem, and its GitHub description calls it a headless CMS for Node.js. The project addresses the need to build a custom back end without writing all of the common content management plumbing by hand.

read the full KeystoneJS overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

i-have-adhd vs ECC i-have-adhd vs react i-have-adhd vs Langflow i-have-adhd vs Supabase i-have-adhd vs puppeteer i-have-adhd vs archify i-have-adhd vs PocketBase i-have-adhd vs codebase-memory-mcp i-have-adhd vs ToolJet i-have-adhd vs AppSmith i-have-adhd vs it-tools i-have-adhd vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is i-have-adhd or KeystoneJS more popular?

i-have-adhd has 48,794 GitHub stars and KeystoneJS has 9,976. i-have-adhd has the larger community by that measure.

Are i-have-adhd and KeystoneJS free?

Both are open source. i-have-adhd is licensed under MIT and KeystoneJS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between i-have-adhd and KeystoneJS?

i-have-adhd is written in Python and KeystoneJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, i-have-adhd or KeystoneJS?

Choose i-have-adhd if you want the larger community (48,794 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose KeystoneJS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.