head to head · open source

Keycloak vs ProjectDiscovery

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars, 8,941 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProjectDiscovery has 31,272 stars, 3,875 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Keycloak leads on adoption by 18% (36,832 vs 31,272 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ProjectDiscovery is written in Go under MIT. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, ProjectDiscovery 12%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak ProjectDiscovery
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 31K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 3.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick ProjectDiscovery if

  • You want the ProjectDiscovery feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ProjectDiscovery fits your workflow better

full ProjectDiscovery profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About ProjectDiscovery

Nuclei is a high performance, open source vulnerability scanner built by ProjectDiscovery, part of the ProjectDiscovery ecosystem. It operates as a CLI tool using a simple YAML based DSL to define custom vulnerability checks, enabling precise, real world exploitation simulation to eliminate false positives.

read the full ProjectDiscovery overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K Better Auth ★ 30K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens keycloak vs zitadel keycloak vs tirreno keycloak vs marble puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs Ory Keycloak vs Hexclave Keycloak vs Permify Keycloak vs Authgear

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or ProjectDiscovery more popular?

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars and ProjectDiscovery has 31,272. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and ProjectDiscovery free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ProjectDiscovery under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and ProjectDiscovery?

Keycloak is written in Java and ProjectDiscovery in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or ProjectDiscovery?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,832 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ProjectDiscovery if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.