head to head · open source

Keycloak vs Sa-Token

Keycloak has 36,855 GitHub stars, 8,942 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sa-Token has 19,048 stars, 2,914 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keycloak leads on adoption by 93% (36,855 vs 19,048 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, Sa-Token 15%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K Sa-Token ★ 19K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak Sa-Token
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 19K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick Sa-Token if

  • You want the Sa-Token feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Sa-Token fits your workflow better

full Sa-Token profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About Sa-Token

Sa Token is a free, open source, one stop Java authentication and authorization framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that gives Java and Spring Boot developers login authentication, permission checks, distributed sessions, single sign on, OAuth2.0, gateway authentication, JWT integration, API key authorization and API parameter signing from a single dependency.

read the full Sa-Token overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs vault keycloak vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat keycloak vs tirreno keycloak vs marble supabase vs better-auth jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault vault vs infisical

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs authelia Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs casbin Keycloak vs hydra Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs Ory Keycloak vs cas Keycloak vs dex

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or Sa-Token more popular?

Keycloak has 36,855 GitHub stars and Sa-Token has 19,048. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and Sa-Token free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sa-Token under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and Sa-Token?

Keycloak is written in Java and Sa-Token in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or Sa-Token?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,855 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Sa-Token if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.