head to head · open source
Jitsi vs textbus
Jitsi has 29,935 GitHub stars, 8,028 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped today. textbus has 1,385 stars, 145 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Jitsi leads on adoption by 2,061% (29,935 vs 1,385 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; textbus is written in TypeScript under MIT. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, textbus 10%. Jitsi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Jitsi | textbus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-06-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.0K | ⑂ 145 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Jitsi if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick textbus if
- You want the textbus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and textbus fits your workflow better
About Jitsi
Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.
read the full Jitsi overview →
About textbus
Textbus English 🚀 Textbus 是一个组件化、跨平台、数据驱动的富文本框架，支持使用 Viewfly、Vue、React 渲染富文本内容，并坚定的支持在线 多人协作 。你可以在 Textbus 中轻松创建出类似钉钉文档、石墨文档、飞书文档等完全自定义的编辑器。 官方文档 Textbus 官方文档 XNote 编辑器 XNote 是 Textbus 官方基于最新 4.0 版本开发的一个无头的、高性能的开源富文本编辑器。提供了开箱即用的大多数功能。也为需要自己开发编辑器的开发者提供了第一手的参考资料，仓库地址： 你也可以直接查看在线演示：在线演示 我最近开了新坑,分别是： 1. 多维表格： 2. PPT 编辑器： 欢迎大家支持。 介绍 我们一直致力于让富文本开发也能像普通前端框架一样，通过简明易懂的 api 和少量的约定，即可开发出使用流畅、交互丰富的富文本应用。 为了解决传统富文本开发的难题，Textbus 首次在富文本中引入了组件的概念，这让富文本开发就像拼积木一样，不再是前端领域不可跨越的天坑。不管你是富文本开发领域的老鸟，亦或是前端的新手，Textbus 都将帮助你把富文本做得更好。 Textbus 的特点 + 组件化 ：根据富文本的特点而专门开发的组件化系统，让富文本编辑支持复杂布局，插入特殊控件等就像现代前端框架一样，非常的简单。 + 完全可控 ：由于 Textbus 采用完全的数据驱动，输…
read the full textbus overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi or textbus more popular?
Jitsi has 29,935 GitHub stars and textbus has 1,385. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Jitsi and textbus free?
Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and textbus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Jitsi and textbus?
Jitsi is written in TypeScript and textbus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Jitsi or textbus?
Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,935 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose textbus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.